urbanists.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
We're a server for people who like bikes, transit, and walkable cities. Let's get to know each other!

Server stats:

558
active users

#AcademicPublishing

8 posts7 participants1 post today

5 Years of GJSD – A Milestone Worth Celebrating - We’re turning 5!

The GILE Journal of Skills Development (@GJSD) has just released its 10th issue, marking 100 peer-reviewed articles published

gjsd.gile-edu.org/index.php/ho

We've explored everything from workforce readiness & leadership in education to AI, resilience, & cross-cultural learning.

"We do not learn for school, but for life." – Seneca
These words still guide us today.

MDPI as a corruption indicator? A new preprint shows a striking trend across Europe 🇪🇺: more MDPI papers → higher perceived corruption → lower innovation.

👉 arxiv.org/abs/2411.06282v1

It’s not that MDPI = bad. But when it dominates, it signals a broken system chasing quantity over quality.

Ukraine? 🇺🇦 Not in the study, but we see the same rise of #MDPI. We could build better. Instead, we copy the worst.

"The biggest mystery is not why arXiv succeeded. Rather, it’s how it wasn’t killed by vested interests intent on protecting traditional academic publishing."

Very interesting interview profile of Paul Ginsparg in WIRED narrating the history of arXiv:
wired.com/story/inside-arxiv-m

WIRED · Inside arXiv—the Most Transformative Platform in All of ScienceBy Sheon Han

Another #spotLights episode just aired! 🎙️

We’re launching our #biologists100 conference series with @richardsever, discussing:

✅ The launch of openRxiv
✅ The role of preprints in supporting early-career researchers
✅ What’s ahead for scholarly publishing & peer review

Recorded live in Liverpool, March 2025 by Jonathan Townson & Reinier Prosee.

Listen now 🎧⬇️
youtu.be/L5O2mDnqDUI?si=yruYx8

Yesterday, our Experimental Publishing reading group took as one of its chosen texts Tara McPherson’s ‘Scaling Vectors: Thoughts on the Future of Scholarly Communication’, which appeared in the Journal of Electronic Publishing in 2010.

quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/33364

It has lines such as: ‘While innovative publishing efforts have emerged from a variety of spaces … it is safe to say that change has not broadly swept through the humanities.’

And: ‘The impulse to conserve the status quo emerges largely from humanities scholars themselves. Faced with a variety of threats (both real and perceived) to the humanities, scholars tend to hold on to established modes of working.’

All raises the question, has much changed in the 15 years since these words were written? And if not, why not? Does anyone have any ideas?

#publishing
#oa
#radicalOA
#academicpublishing #experimentalpublishing #journals #humanities

quod.lib.umich.eduScaling Vectors: Thoughts on the Future of Scholarly Communication

EAZ Vol. 15, No. 4 (1974) is now available online! With contributions covering, among others, the archaeology and ethnography of the Caucasus, physical anthropology, along with reviews of a number of palynological publications and conference reports, including the II Symposion Byzantinon in Strasbourg, the volume is now added to our archives.
#Archaeology #Palynology #AcademicPublishing #EAZ #EAZArchives
Read here: eaz-journal.org/index.php/eaz/