urbanists.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
We're a server for people who like bikes, transit, and walkable cities. Let's get to know each other!

Server stats:

553
active users

#nationalist

1 post1 participant0 posts today

Does this include #AntiZionists? You know that #Zionism and #Judaism are different things, right?

You also know #Zionists will call anyone they see as a threat to the #Isreali state #antisemite, right?

Doesn't matter if they're wrong, you're now giving a #judicial weapon to a bunch of #theocratic #nationalist #fascists who pine for their own "final solution" against all #Palestinians.

#Germany could withdraw #citizenship due to '#antisemitism' – DW – 04/01/2025
dw.com/en/germany-could-withdr

Deutsche Welle · Germany could withdraw citizenship due to 'antisemitism'By Sarah Judith Hofmann

Diaspora Jewish population has an inverse relationship to nationalism? I'm bought into this theory.

"There were 90,250 #Jews in #Montreal in 2021, according to the most recent #Canadian census—580 more individuals than were counted a decade earlier.

And while 0.6 percent increase might seem like a blip, it represented the first gain in 50 years.

McGill sociology professor Morton Weinfeld considers it noteworthy enough, given that Montreal had the larger #Jewish population than #Toronto prior to the decline: “The reason some people were so delighted with these results is because it may indicate a reversal of that trend.”

And yet, Montreal’s community hasn’t bounced back to its 1991 high of 101,000. The number has remained sharp in the minds of many since the community contracted following #Quebec’s #nationalist and language surrounding Bill 101."

thecjn.ca/news/montreal-jewish

The Canadian Jewish News · What the latest population statistics say about Jewish Montreal's present and futureFederation CJA recently issued its deeper data dive based on Canada's 2021 census.

20 Lessons from the 20th Century About How to Defend #Democracy from #Authoritarianism, According to Yale #Historian #TimothySnyder

in History | January 20th, 2017

"Timothy Snyder, Housum Professor of History at Yale University, is one of the foremost scholars in the U.S. and Europe on the rise and fall of #totalitarianism during the 1930s and 40s. Among his long list of appointments and publications, he has won multiple awards for his recent international bestsellers '#Bloodlands: Europe between #Hitler and #Stalin' and last year’s 'Black Earth: The #Holocaust as History and Warning.' That book in part makes the argument that #Nazism wasn’t only a #German #nationalist movement but had global #colonialist origins—in #Russia, #Africa, and in the #UnitedStates, the nation that pioneered so many methods of human extermination, #racist #dehumanization, and ideologically-justified #LandGrabs.

"The hyper-#capitalism portrayed in the U.S.—even during the Depression—Snyder writes, fueled Hitler’s imagination, such that he promised Germans 'a life comparable to that of the American people,' whose 'racially pure and uncorrupted' German population he described as 'world class.' Snyder describes Hitler’s ideology as a myth of racialist struggle in which 'there are really no values in the world except for the stark reality that we are born in order to take things from other people.' Or as we often hear these days, that acting in accordance with this principle is the 'smart' thing to do. Like many far right figures before and after, Hitler aimed to restore a state of nature that for him was a perpetual state of race war for imperial dominance."

openculture.com/2017/01/20-les
#History #Histodon #Hitler #Fascism #Authoritarianism #HyperCapitalism #CorporateFascism #CorporateColonialism

Open Culture20 Lessons from the 20th Century About How to Defend Democracy from Authoritarianism, According to Yale Historian Timothy SnyderTimothy Snyder, Housum Professor of History at Yale University, is one of the foremost scholars in the U.S. and Europe on the rise and fall of totalitarianism during the 1930s and 40s.

"By positioning America as an ally of #nationalist forces against these institutions (#Europe), #Vance isn't just ending an alliance - he's actively working to unwind the entire post-war European #peace architecture, which could have immense ramifications. In fact I think we can even legitimately ask ourselves if the U.S. doesn't now have war in Europe as one of its strategic objectives."

From: @rnaudbertrand
bird.makeup/users/rnaudbertran

bird.makeupArnaud BertrandReally hard not to make the parallel between JD Vance's speech right now at the Munich Security Conference and Putin's 2007 speech at the very same podium. https://x.com/business/status/1890421715747918219/video/1 Both were watershed moments that fundamentally transformed the existing consensus. Putin at the time delivered the speech that marked the beginning of the end of the unipolar moment. JD Vance's speech will probably be remembered as the speech that marked the beginning of the end of the post-WW2 Western alliance. As a European, I'm in two minds about what Vance said about Europe. He is of course right about many things. For instance Europe's attitude with respect to Romania's elections was beyond appalling and unequivocally antidemocratic. I myself called it out repeatedly on this platform. But - and this is a very big BUT - on Romania and much of Vance's criticism directed at Europe, the U.S. was right there alongside Europe acting jointly, and often even guiding Europe's actions. Specifically on Romania for instance, I believe that the US State Department was first in issuing a statement on December 4th (https://2021-2025.state.gov/statement-on-romanias-presidential-elections/) expressing its concern about "Russian involvement in malign cyber activity designed to influence the integrity of the Romanian electoral process" which led to the elections being cancelled two days later (and which, it was later proven, was completely false: it turned out that this "malign cyber activity" were paid for by the very Romanian party in power that cancelled the elections!). It's only after that State Department statement that the Europeans followed the U.S.'s lead. So it's a bit rich, even very rich, for Vance, less than 2 months afterwards, to lecture Europeans on this without as much as acknowledging the U.S.'s own role in a lot of it. Same could be said about European content moderation and "censorship." He conveniently forgets that much of Europe's current approach was developed in close coordination with American agencies and tech companies. The EU's content moderation framework didn't emerge in a vacuum - it was heavily influenced by American practices and pressures. Or take Vance's criticism of European mass migration policies. He spent a big part of his speech lamenting over the attack in Munich yesterday by (apparently) a young Afghan asylum seeker, describing it as a direct "result of a series of conscious decisions made by politicians all over the [European] continent". But he conveniently fails to mention why Afghans migrated en-masse out of their country, which might have a little something to do with a certain great power that decided to wage a 20-year long war over there and completely wrecked the country... Same story for many migrants in Europe, a huge share of them being a direct result of disastrous US foreign policy decisions. I'm also extremely uncomfortable with Vance's stated intentions to meddle in European politics. He calls out - rightly - Europe for not living up to its democratic values, yet in the same breath he's explicitly announcing America's intention to intervene in European politics by supporting certain movements against established institutions. He criticizes European elites for not respecting democratic choices while simultaneously suggesting that a Trump administration would actively work to influence those choices. How is this any different from the kind of interference he hypocritically condemns? Perhaps most worrying of all, Vance's vision seems to completely disregard why the post-WW2 European architecture was built in the first place. Europe is the place where both world wars started, 100% of them. The past 80 years were a uniquely peaceful time in European history: due to the high density of states in a relatively small geography and the somewhat disagreeable character of many European nations (the French very much included), the continent had been in almost constant conflict for the previous millennium. I really dislike European institutions as much as the next guy but I don't forget the original spirit with which they were built: to put an end to endless war in Europe. By positioning America as an ally of nationalist forces against these institutions, Vance isn't just ending an alliance - he's actively working to unwind the entire post-war European peace architecture, which could have immense ramifications. In fact I think we can even legitimately ask ourselves if the U.S. doesn't now have war in Europe as one of its strategic objectives. Given the U.S.'s history in triggering wars left, right and center when it believes they're in their interests, and given Vance's speech, I think the question has merits. All in all, I'm not ashamed to say that I much prefer Putin's 2007 speech to Vance's. Whatever you may think, Putin remained within the confines of what he thought were challenges to Russia's national interests, issues like NATO expansion or American attempt at global hegemony. He didn't try to meddle in intra-Western politics or position Russia as an active force for undermining Western institutions from within. His vision was about creating a multipolar world where Russia would be one independent pole - not about dismantling the internal architecture of other poles. Where Putin wanted to limit Western power globally, Vance seems to want to fracture the European order locally. That's a far more dangerous proposition. I'm all for reforming Europe and I constantly call for it. But to me by far the biggest issue for Europe is its lack of sovereignty and strategic autonomy, especially vis à vis the United States, in almost all domains. If Vance's speech could have any silver lining, it would be to finally wake Europeans up to this reality: let's hope that for once Europe draws the right lesson.

washingtonpost.com/politics/20

#VPVance fully waded into #nationalist politics, blasting an audience of European prime ministers and presidents for failing to listen to their own voters.

“In America, you cannot win a democratic mandate by censoring your opponents or putting them in jail,” Vance told the gathered elite at the Munich Security Conference, in remarks that some European leaders interpreted as a slam that they were not truly democratic.

The Washington Post · Vance meets with leader of far-right German party, exports MAGA messageBy Michael Birnbaum
Continued thread

#JDVance is the most senior US official ever to meet with a leader from the party. He also met in recent days w/the leaders of #Germany’s 2 other major parties, which are locked in competition ahead of Feb 23 elections, in which the Alternative for Germany #AfD party might break through a post-World War II taboo & join a ruling coalition for the first time.

In his speech, Vance fully waded into #nationalist politics….

Continued thread

But wait there’s more

#JDVance meets w/leader of #FarRight #Germany party, exports #MAGA
The VP gave a scolding speech advocating that Europe’s centrist old-guard politicians move over to accommodate the rising anti-migration, #nationalist voices they have at times sought to block from power.

The meeting w/ #AliceWeidel, head of the anti-#immigration, nationalist Alternative for Germany #AfD party, was a major step for her movement….

#geopolitics #WhiteNationalism
washingtonpost.com/politics/20

The Washington Post · Vance meets with leader of far-right German party, exports MAGA messageBy Michael Birnbaum
Continued thread

Update. "White House budget proposal could shatter the National Science Foundation"
arstechnica.com/science/2025/0

" 'This kind of cut would kill American science and boost #China and other nations into global science leadership positions,' [said] Neal Lane, who led the #NSF in the 1990s during Bill Clinton's presidency."

PS: I've never liked #nationalist arguments for funding or fostering science. Science is international. But the #Trump admin is putting us in a dilemma. Either we see deep cuts in US science funding. Or we use nationalist arguments to avert those cuts.

There are non-nationalist arguments to fund US science. For example, good science is usually expensive and those who do it well should be funded for the benefit of all. Unfortunately that argument is not likely to work on Trump admin officials. It's not US-specific and applies everywhere, even in China.

Ars Technica · White House budget proposal could shatter the National Science FoundationBy Eric Berger

#Project2025 #coup success

#Senate confirms #RussellVought to lead #OMB

The Senate on Thurs confirmed #RussVought as the next director of the powerful WH budget office, installing a *#conservative* *fiscal* hawk [really just a #white #cis #hetero #Christian #nationalist] has promised to pursue sweeping spending cuts & empower #Trump to conform the budget to his political views.
#Republicans marshaled a 53-47 [ummm] vote in support of #Vought….

#law #TrumpCoup
washingtonpost.com/business/20

The Washington Post · Senate confirms Russell Vought to lead White House budget officeBy Tony Romm